Formalities aside, folks, our co-created reality based in dispassionate collectivity, fueled by mythic and mutable forces and reality myths vexes us. Humanity enters deeper collective dysfunction each passing day. So let me be 100% forthright, without caveat or apology, and certainly without sufficient explanation insofar as satisfying whomever you are to have made your way to reading this.
What I have generated to date can and will catalyze the necessary and sufficient work to save humanity from itself. Not metaphorically. Actually. Not individually. Collectively. Not recapitulating the past. Creating a future.
I am well prepared to defend these claims.
Your role here? DON’T BE TOO CYNICAL OR (C)RUSHED TO TRUST IN REPAIR.
Ask and inquire…
If you find what you see here and at okic.science deeply counterintuitive or even nonsensical, consider that those would be quite natural features of an informational cipher. The questions to ask are — Is reality both material and a cipher and if so might its informational patterning be decipherable, over time, by a human working with interdisciplinary, relaxed yet attentive focus toward just such a goal?
<aside>
Supporting what I'm up to is a big ask for anyone, both in scope and systematic complexity. So even if you do not see yourself reflected in my work, if you understand the general goal (stated above), are on board with that (easy, really), and willing to risk being “wrong” (among friends, that’s easy too), then share my big picture goal with someone you know who might be ready / willing / able to disrupt communication and technology for the better.
</aside>
“Through existentially attuned information tools, we will achieve the living balance needed to navigate the technological age with aplomb.” - from About EO
Aug 2026
Q/A : How is it even possible for your work, which is geometric and flat (2-dimensional), to represent the spatially robust (3-dimensional) reality we live in as comprehensively as you say it does?
I have finally worked out the answer in a precise way. And my reply is two-fold. At base, my work is not geometric but in-formational. The visualizations shown throughout my public work can be thought of as its abstract meta-language. But there’s a more interesting reason.
Exploring common dynamics of cycles and circles in OKIC, I learned something clever about the mathematical constant π (~ 3.14). Here’s my full essay on The Unitary Mystery, which culminates in the following broadly explanatory figure.
In OKIC-speak, (p) is inner kaleidoscope, (r) is valid meta-anchor, and (q) is context distribution. The Circle Paradox specifies that causal circles arise through the stable intersection of three equally- and precisely-scaled and overlapping informational, or meta-phenomenal, circles. Causal circles (111→11) in effect flatten unitary appearances, including cyclic meta-phenomena, being in a very real sense disguised by a factor of ~ π-3 referent confusion that evokes the infinite.
